Sure makes you wonder... Sorry it's just a "Conspiracy" Oh...okay...
Let's just face the facts and quit trying to distort the truth. We have a Muslim as president in the White House who lies about and refuses to satisfy legitimate questions into his very suspicious background and behavior. Check it out for yourself.
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called "Negroes". So why/how can the 1961 Obama Hawaiian 'Birth Certificate' released by the White House state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't coined and in widespread use at that time? A birth certificate is supposed to be a public record, but the President has been able to order his original birth records sealed so we can't see them, but couldn't we look at the certificates of other black Hawaiians born in 1961 to see if they are also described as "African Americans?" Could it be that the "White House Certificate" is simply a forgery, one where the forger thought that political correctness required not using the now out of date term "Negro?"
2. The birth certificate that the White House released Lists Obama's date of birth as August 4, 1961, and named Barack Hussein Obama as his father.
No big deal, right? However, the certificate also states that his father is 25 years old having been born in "Kenya , East Africa." This wouldn't seem
like anything of much concern, except for the fact that Kenya did not come into existence as a country until 1963, 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Until Kenya became a country in 1963, two years after Obama's "birth," it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate." Wouldn't there be thousands of birth records from the British East Africa Protectorate for the years prior to 1963 that we could examine to see if "Kenya" appears on any or all of those. Or, could this simply be another example of a less than careful forgery?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
No big deal, right? However, the certificate also states that his father is 25 years old having been born in "Kenya , East Africa." This wouldn't seem
like anything of much concern, except for the fact that Kenya did not come into existence as a country until 1963, 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Until Kenya became a country in 1963, two years after Obama's "birth," it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate." Wouldn't there be thousands of birth records from the British East Africa Protectorate for the years prior to 1963 that we could examine to see if "Kenya" appears on any or all of those. Or, could this simply be another example of a less than careful forgery?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of Obama's birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynaecological Hospital".
This seems impossible because in 1961 the two institutions were named "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home" respectively. The two were not combined to form what became the Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynaecological Hospital until 1978, fifteen years after the Obama birth. How can this particular hospital name be on a Birth Certificate dated 1961 if the name did not come into existence until 1978? Explanation? Carelessness? A forgery?
http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx
This seems impossible because in 1961 the two institutions were named "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home" respectively. The two were not combined to form what became the Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynaecological Hospital until 1978, fifteen years after the Obama birth. How can this particular hospital name be on a Birth Certificate dated 1961 if the name did not come into existence until 1978? Explanation? Carelessness? A forgery?
http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx
3. Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?
Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father.
He writes how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. Unfortunately, as stated above, the "Birth Certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961. That would have put his father's date of birth in approximately 1936. A non- revised history book, one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals will quickly verify that WW II occurred basically between the years 1939 and 1945. Not many three year-olds fight in wars, and even in the last stages of WW II, Obama's father wouldn't then have been more than nine years old! Does that mean that Mr. Obama is actually a liar, or is it that he simply chooses to alter historical facts either to satisfy his imagination, or possibly for political purposes?
Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father.
He writes how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. Unfortunately, as stated above, the "Birth Certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961. That would have put his father's date of birth in approximately 1936. A non- revised history book, one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals will quickly verify that WW II occurred basically between the years 1939 and 1945. Not many three year-olds fight in wars, and even in the last stages of WW II, Obama's father wouldn't then have been more than nine years old! Does that mean that Mr. Obama is actually a liar, or is it that he simply chooses to alter historical facts either to satisfy his imagination, or possibly for political purposes?
5. "Wedding ring is in for repair"
Since when does a plain gold wedding band need repairs, along with a watch, and then for a whole month? Another piece falls into place.
In a recent press conference last week President Obama was not wearing his wedding ring, nor was he wearing his watch. When noticed, his staff explained that his ring was out for repairs. No reason was given for the missing watch. So is it just a coincidence that July 7 began the month of Ramadan, and that Muslims are forbidden from wearing jewelry during that time? Could that possibly be the explanation? Even though President Obama hasn't been to a Christian church service since entering the White House, and even though he routinely leaves Washington D.C. in order to avoid the presidential duties usually conducted by our presidents at Christmastime, we know he's a committed born again Christian because he said so during his campaign! But, really?
Since when does a plain gold wedding band need repairs, along with a watch, and then for a whole month? Another piece falls into place.
In a recent press conference last week President Obama was not wearing his wedding ring, nor was he wearing his watch. When noticed, his staff explained that his ring was out for repairs. No reason was given for the missing watch. So is it just a coincidence that July 7 began the month of Ramadan, and that Muslims are forbidden from wearing jewelry during that time? Could that possibly be the explanation? Even though President Obama hasn't been to a Christian church service since entering the White House, and even though he routinely leaves Washington D.C. in order to avoid the presidential duties usually conducted by our presidents at Christmastime, we know he's a committed born again Christian because he said so during his campaign! But, really?
Interesting....
ReplyDelete